WEETRA examines what a regulatory figure is built on: its documents, its sources, its calculations. We surface what does not hold. An inconsistency, a piece of critical evidence that is missing, a source that cannot carry its claim. And we do it before a file is locked for reporting.
Reporting now runs on structured data, sources that can be traced, calculations that hold, and a documentary trail someone can actually review. WEETRA checks whether each material value ties back to a source, matches the documents, and, where the data allows, can be recomputed.
Documentary source review and validation.
Verification of declared values against extracted and recalculated values.
Detection and flagging of contradictions and evidence gaps.
Verification of the integrity and traceability of the evidence chain.
High-level assessment of regulatory exposure and structural readiness.
First structured review of the documentary base of a dossier.
Cross-document consistency, contradiction analysis and defensibility.
Link-by-link evidence-chain examination for high-exposure files.
The mission level reflects the depth of the methodological review, not a purchased outcome.
CBAM is WEETRA's first operational use case. WEETRA reviews the coherence and traceability of supporting information relating to goods, installations, embedded emissions, calculation inputs and documentary evidence.
These are internal methodological review statuses and not regulatory decisions or certifications.
Current operational use case for embedded emissions traceability.
OperationalMethodological extension for product-level structural evidence.
Designed extensionSubsequent extension for origin, geolocation and due-diligence chains.
Planned extensionMethodological opinions, structural findings, and regulatory analysis from the WEETRA institute.
